Elara is a seasoned journalist and digital content creator with a passion for uncovering stories that matter.
In the eyes of a lifelong Dodgers fan and third-generation Mexican American, the crowning moment of the World Series didn't happen during the tense final game on Saturday, when her squad executed one death-defying comeback feat after another and then winning in overtime against the opposing team.
It came in the previous game, when two second-tier players, Kike Hernández and Miguel Rojas, executed a thrilling, decisive play that at the same time challenged many negative misconceptions promoted about Hispanic people in the past decades.
The moment in itself was stunning: Hernández raced in from left field to catch a ball he initially misjudged in the bright lights, then fired it to second base to record another, game-winning out. the second baseman, at second base, received the ball just a split second before a runner collided with him, knocking him backwards.
This wasn't just a remarkable athletic achievement, perhaps the key shift in the series in the Dodgers' direction after looking for much of the series like the underdog side. For Molina, it was exhilarating, on multiple levels, a much-required uplift for Latinos and for the city after months of enforcement actions, security forces monitoring the neighborhoods, and a constant drumbeat of negativity from national leaders.
"Kike and Miggy presented this alternative story," said the professor. "The world saw Latinos displaying an contagious pride and joy in what they do, being leaders on the team, exhibiting a different kind of confidence. They're energetic, they're yelling, they're removing their shirts."
"This represented such a juxtaposition with what we see on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos detained and chased down. It's so easy to be disheartened these days."
However, it's exactly simple to be a Dodgers fan these days – for her or for the many of other Latinos who attend regularly to home games and fill up as many as half of the stadium's 50,000 spots per game.
After aggressive immigration raids started in Los Angeles in June, and military troops were deployed into the area to respond to ensuing demonstrations, two of the local soccer clubs quickly issued messages of solidarity with immigrant families – while the baseball team.
Management has said the organization prefer to steer clear of politics – a view colored, perhaps, by the reality that a sizable portion of the supporters, including Latinos, are supporters of certain political figures. After considerable external demands, the organization later pledged $one million in aid for individuals directly affected by the operations but made no public condemnation of the government.
Three months before, the team did not delay in agreeing to an offer to mark their 2024 championship victory at the official residence – a decision that sports columnists labeled as "disappointing … weak … and contradictory", given the Dodgers' boast in having been the first professional franchise to end the racial segregation in the 1940s and the frequent invocations of that legacy and the values it represents by executives and current and past players. A number of team members including the manager had expressed unwillingness to go to the event during the first term but either reconsidered or succumbed to pressure from the organization.
A further issue for fans is that the team are controlled by a large investment group, Guggenheim Partners, whose investments, according to sources and its own released balance sheets, involve a stake in a private prison corporation that runs enforcement centers. The group's executives has said repeatedly that it wants to remain neutral of politics, but its critics say the inaction – and the investment – are their own form of compliance to certain policies.
These factors add up to considerable mixed feelings among Hispanic fans in particular – sentiments that surfaced even in the euphoria of this year's hard-fought championship victory and the following outpouring of team pride across Los Angeles.
"Can one to support the team?" local columnist one observer reflected at the start of the playoffs in an thoughtful essay pondering on "team loyalty in our blood, but uncertainty in our hearts". Galindo was unable to finally bring himself to watch the World Series, but he still cared deeply, to the point that he believed his one-man protest must have brought the squad the luck it required to succeed.
Numerous supporters who have similar misgivings seem to have decided that they can continue to support the players and its lineup of global stars, including the Asian megastar Shohei Ohtani, while pouring scorn on the team's corporate leadership. Nowhere was this more clear than at the championship parade at Dodger Stadium on Monday, when the packed audience roared in approval of the coach and his athletes but jeered the team president and the chief executive of the ownership group.
"These men in suits do not get to claim our boys in blue from us," the fan said. "We've been with the team for more time than they have."
The problem, though, runs deeper than only the team's current owners. The agreement that brought the former franchise to Los Angeles in the late 1950s involved the municipality demolishing three low-income Hispanic communities on a elevated area overlooking downtown and then selling the land to the team for a fraction of its actual worth. A song on a 2005 record that documents the events has an impoverished parking attendant at the stadium revealing that the house he forfeited to removal is now third base.
Gustavo Arellano, possibly the region's most widely followed Latino columnist and broadcaster, sees a more troubling side to the lengthy, problematic dynamic between the team and its fanbase. He describes the Dodgers the Flamin' Hot Cheetos of baseball, "a corporate entity with an excessive, even unhealthy devotion by too many Latinos" that has been exploiting its fans for years.
"They've acted around Hispanic followers while picking their pockets with the other for so long because they have been able to avoid consequences," Arellano noted over the summer, when calls to boycott the team over its lack of response to the raids were contradicted by the uncomfortable reality that attendance at home games remained steady, even at the height of the demonstrations when downtown LA was under to a nightly restriction.
Separating the team from its corporate owners is not a simple matter, {
Elara is a seasoned journalist and digital content creator with a passion for uncovering stories that matter.