Elara is a seasoned journalist and digital content creator with a passion for uncovering stories that matter.
It's slightly awkward to admit, but let me explain. A handful of books sit by my bed, each partially consumed. Inside my mobile device, I'm some distance through 36 audio novels, which looks minor compared to the nearly fifty digital books I've left unfinished on my e-reader. The situation does not account for the expanding collection of advance copies next to my side table, competing for blurbs, now that I work as a established novelist personally.
Initially, these stats might appear to support contemporary opinions about current focus. A writer noted recently how effortless it is to break a reader's focus when it is divided by social media and the 24-hour news. He remarked: “Perhaps as individuals' concentration change the fiction will have to adapt with them.” Yet as a person who used to doggedly get through every novel I picked up, I now view it a human right to set aside a novel that I'm not in the mood for.
I do not feel that this practice is a result of a brief concentration – instead it comes from the feeling of life slipping through my fingers. I've often been affected by the Benedictine principle: “Keep mortality daily in mind.” A different point that we each have a only limited time on this planet was as sobering to me as to others. And yet at what previous time in history have we ever had such instant availability to so many mind-blowing creative works, whenever we choose? A surplus of treasures awaits me in any bookshop and within any digital platform, and I aim to be intentional about where I focus my energy. Is it possible “DNF-ing” a book (term in the book world for Did Not Finish) be not just a indication of a poor focus, but a discerning one?
Notably at a period when the industry (consequently, commissioning) is still controlled by a particular group and its issues. Even though exploring about people different from us can help to strengthen the ability for understanding, we furthermore select stories to think about our personal lives and place in the society. Unless the titles on the shelves more fully reflect the identities, realities and concerns of prospective individuals, it might be very challenging to keep their interest.
Naturally, some writers are indeed successfully creating for the “today's focus”: the concise prose of selected current novels, the tight pieces of different authors, and the brief parts of several recent titles are all a excellent showcase for a shorter style and method. Furthermore there is plenty of author tips designed for securing a audience: perfect that initial phrase, polish that opening chapter, increase the drama (higher! further!) and, if crafting thriller, place a dead body on the first page. This guidance is completely good – a possible agent, publisher or audience will spend only a several valuable seconds deciding whether or not to proceed. It is no benefit in being contrary, like the person on a writing course I participated in who, when challenged about the narrative of their manuscript, declared that “everything makes sense about 75% of the into the story”. No writer should put their audience through a sequence of challenges in order to be understood.
But I absolutely write to be clear, as far as that is possible. At times that demands guiding the consumer's hand, guiding them through the plot point by succinct point. Sometimes, I've understood, insight demands perseverance – and I must grant me (as well as other creators) the freedom of meandering, of layering, of digressing, until I hit upon something authentic. One writer makes the case for the novel finding innovative patterns and that, rather than the traditional plot structure, “alternative forms might help us conceive new approaches to make our stories vital and true, keep making our works original”.
Accordingly, the two opinions align – the fiction may have to change to suit the today's consumer, as it has constantly achieved since it began in the 18th century (as we know it currently). Maybe, like earlier writers, tomorrow's creators will return to serialising their novels in newspapers. The next these authors may already be releasing their work, chapter by chapter, on online sites such as those used by many of regular users. Creative mediums evolve with the times and we should permit them.
But do not say that every changes are all because of shorter focus. If that was so, concise narrative collections and micro tales would be viewed considerably more {commercial|profitable|marketable
Elara is a seasoned journalist and digital content creator with a passion for uncovering stories that matter.